Quick to hear
KEVIN PUFFER·
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2017
I have been told (almost daily) in recent weeks, that “silence is acceptance”, and to not participate in the social media civil war that most of the country seems to be engaged in is tantamount to being unpatriotic or apathetic. I strongly disagree.
I’m old enough to remember several previous administrations, going back to J.F. Kennedy, who was well liked and well known for many things, (one of which was his blatant philandering). I can’t remember a single administration that did not have its dissidents or vocal opposition. Freedom to express an opinion is woven into the fabric of our democracy and includes both well-reasoned fact -based opinions and emotionally charged fact-starved opinions informed by too much hatred, misinformation, peer-pressure, and ugly bias. In this country, expressing an opinion is a right, not a duty. Civility however is a duty, not an option. Not expressing an opinion is likewise a right and oftentimes prudent. Refusing to engage or participate in pointless contention, name-calling, hyperbole, fact manipulation, and other negative forms of expression is no indication that one lacks an opinion. (Proverbs 26:4)
The things that seem to outrage folks and make enemies of friends today are often a minor variations on old themes; that is, much of what we see today we have seen before. But, did we see the same people outraged over similar actions that happened in the past? Were the same people also engaged in public protests, violent vitriol, name-calling and character assassination when previous administrations did the same thing? Did they produce the same division among family and friends, the same disrespect, abstention from ceremony by elected officials, gloom and doom pontificating, unchecked hyperbole, hatred, and fear mongering when…
- A previous administration imposed much more burdensome requirements on the refugee program (2011) then this most recent one, after it was discovered that two Iraqis who had been granted asylum were guilty of terrorism. (result, number of immigrant refugees in 2010: 18,251. number in 2011 6,339)
- A previous administration signed a defense bill (Dec 31, 2011) granting the executive office the authority to detain anyone at any time.
- A previous administration approved another law (March 7, 2011) cementing a system of military commissions that impeded the right to a fair trial.
- A previous commander-in-chief authorized drone operators to kill (up to) 117 foreign civilians (non-combatants) .
- Under a previous commander-in-chief, drone operators killed an American citizen (2015) but failed to reveal it for several months, or when drones accidentally killed other American citizens previous to that (2002 Darwish, 2009, 2011 Awlaka Khan, 2013 Mohammad).
- A previous commander-in-chief assembled a secret “kill list” (2012) of those he wanted targeted and liquidated.
- A previous commander-in-chief authorized extensive use of American drones in Yemen; a US run terror operation that is said to have caused an entire generation there to be crippled by PTSD.
- A previous commander-in-chief launched an illegal war in Libya without obtaining congressional approval, only for that country to deteriorate into jihadist bedlam.
- A previous commander-in-chief backed a gruesome Saudi bombing campaign in Yemen that’s resulted in mass starvation and untold civilian deaths.
- The most recent x-commander-in-chief deployed American troops to at least five different countries, without Congressional approval, citing the authorization for use of military force that was passed after 9/11 while telling the American people we “will not put boots on the ground”.
- The previous administration attempted to exclude a single news crew from the White House press pool because the administration didn’t like that particular network’s critical coverage.
- The most recent administration’s communications staffer, Anita Dunn, denegrated Fox news as “either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party.”
- The most recent administration literally tried to obtain a warrant against a Fox reporter under the Espionage Act
- The most recent administration harvested two months’ worth of phone records from the Associated Press.
- The most recent administration and previous secretary of state blamed the filmmaker Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, and his anti-Muslim satire video, as the cause of the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, causing Nakoula to be imprisoned and impoverished.
- The executive branch used the IRS to suppress the legal activities of the tea party
- The executive branch forced through a law that required American individuals and families to purchase health insurance regardless of whether they want it or could afford it, and imposed punitive fines on those who choose to not buy or could not buy health insurance.
- The executive branch denied the most Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests in history or when he used the FOIA fee system to favor friendly political groups.
- The executive branch illegally claimed the authority to accept illegal immigrants as citizens thereby insulting those who properly obtained their citizenship legally.
- The executive branch coerced telecom companies and internet companies into surrendering their customers’ private information.
- Many US Presidents going back decades have held states hostage with the threat of withdrawing federal funds if they don’t comply with various mandates.
- The Affordable Care Act became law, and it handed unprecedented extensive power (over one sixth of the American economy) to a single unelected health bureaucrat.
- The passage of the Clean Air Act gave broadly sweeping power to The EPA which allows it to do whatever it likes. Under this act police literally legally steal people’s property through the license of civil asset forfeiture.
You may have agreed with some of the executive acts (above) and may have disagreed with some of them. I admit I did not even remember some of the things on the above list myself until I was reminded of them by several recent reports. Some I barely remember, some I discussed with others, some I kept quiet about, some still bother me today, and some inform how I vote. You may have spoken out publicly or privately at the time, or you may have kept your opinion to yourself. If you spoke, others heard you. If you voted, the nation heard you. When you did speak, others heard you even if they didn’t’ agree with you. Others heard you even if they didn’t respond by sharing their own opinion with you. But from my vantage point it is difficult to give much credence to a strong opinion about a current executive action when there was no similar outcry by the same people when previous administrations made similar executive actions. It seems hypocritical at worst, or naively unfamiliar with recent history at best. A deeper dive into history reveals similar or worse executive actions going back well before my memory. Past wrongs don’t make present rights, of course; misdeeds of the past do not excuse misdeeds of today. But, only squawking about the current administration because you don’t like the current president while you blinked at similar things in the past because you liked the sitting administration is duplicitous, and frankly, unworthy of much attention. If you want others to pay attention to you, be consistent. Bein inconsistent makes me think you are not really trying to make the world better, but only trying to pick and win a fight. I have no interest in that kind of senseless contention.
Furthermore, it is unjust to be told that because I’m not acting out in the same way as someone else over current situations, that those things must not bother me. They may or may not bother me. The way I'm acting may just be my way, and my way is not be the same as your way, and nothing more. I’m not acting out in the same way as you does not mean I don’t have a valid opinion. I do. I will express my opinion in the way I feel is prudent and helpful, thank you. If you want my opinion, just ask me. I’m happy to share my point of view with you, but only if you are willing to listen. If you are not inclined to listen, I will not be inclined to speak. I observe many expressing their point of view loudly and frequently, but I see too little evidence of folks asking for, or actually listening to others point of view.
To my Christian friends, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow
to wrath; for the wrath of man
does not produce the righteousness of God. James 1:19-20
And do
not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind,
that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of
God. Romans 12:2
- James 1:19-20